trauma room

Yes, these are the challenging cases. The idea is to exclude patients for whom your team has ruled out traumatic injury. If your team is transferring and has not ruled …

The patient would be NPTOS for the second encounter. This applies to existing injury and newly identified injury attributed to the same traumatic event.

I agree with you capturing this patient as PTOS and recording them as a transfer out since all of your documentation appears to indicate the patient was to go to …

This is a good question. Since the abrasions are not injuries that fall within the accepted PTOS ICD-10-CM code range, this patient should be excluded from PTOS. Note the following …

The reason for this inclusion/exclusion guidance is to ensure consistency statewide. It is our hope that this guidance will eliminate hospitals making differing determinations using variables that are not part …

: Since this patient is a transfer in, you will include this patient as PTOS. A patient that meets the PTOS inclusion criteria prior to the order for hospice care, …

No, this patient won’t be PTOS if the injury happened in your hospital while they were a patient. They do not need to be officially admitted, may be in ED …

These are tricky scenarios, and clarification is typically needed from the provider in order to make a determination. We recommend querying the provider for clarification on whether this is a …

No, not necessarily. If they are saying this is osteoporotic, and therefore pathological, then no it wouldn’t be PTOS. That could get coded to M80.08XA, Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological …

There is currently no flag for the NTDB/TQIP or a check in PTOS that generates if the injury date/time is unknown regarding the 14-day requirement. Therefore, it is the default …